There are different groups and individuals who support Dajjal directly and indirectly. Their ideas and intentions can be very different and carried by ideals like humanism but also by greed for wealth and power, racism, nationalism and many other things. Hammer and chisel seen for themselves are quite different things like Zionism and humanism are. But like a builder who uses these different tools for one purpose, so does Dajjal use the different groups for his purpose.
Often it is stated that Freemasonry developed out of mediaeval guilds of freemasons and that its values resulted from the age of Enlightenment. The five pillars of freemasonry are: Freedom, Equality, Fraternity, Tolerance and Humanism. Humanism encompasses all previous pillars and is symbolized by the temple of Salomon on which the freemasons are working (one should remember that one of the goals of Dajjal is to rebuild the temple of Salomon).
But it is fact that in the year 926 already the freemasons in England were summoned by King Athelstan and took their seat in York, with the brother of the king as grandmaster. Obviously the child is mistaken as the father. Certainly it was freemasonry which inspired the values of the Enlightenment and not the other way around. The Freemasons on their part were inspired by the Kabbalah like e.g. the Knights Templar.
The question if a Christian Kabbalah, a kabbalistic mysticism with Christian elements, ever existed, cannot be answered for sure. But evident is a fruitful reception of kabbalistic scriptures in the early humanism like Giovanni Pico della Mirandola in 1486 - "Philosophical, kabbalistic und theological conclusions" and his "About the human dignity", published in 1496. Johannes Reuchlin united Christian theology, Pythagorean and new-platonic philosophy as well as Jewish mystic to a synthesis and Agrippa of Nettesheim wrote 1530 with "About the hidden Philosophy" a 'bestseller'. Therein he combines kabbalistic esoteric with Christian dogmatism.
Two of the early philosophers are Heraclites and Protagoras. They were teaching that everything is bound to eternal change (Teaching of the flow of all things); at the same time man could recognize unity in diversity and diversity in unity and himself as part of a whole (Teaching of the unity of all things); there would be no moral absolutes and man as creative being would be the highest authority in the universe.
In particular is called humanism the intellectual climate of the 15th and 16th century which turned away from the middle age and the scholastic. Commonly one differentiates today between Renaissance as cultural and social change and humanism as its educational basis. In the 15th century existed already circles which called themselves 'humanistae'. The antique Greek education was the superior ideal and mankind glorified as highest of all of creation.
But because the existence of God was not commonly accepted, the untouchable dignity of mankind became the foundation of a value system in most of the national constitutions. In its negative aspect humanism got a secular non-religious concept: the negation of any divine powers superior to mankind. Instead of religion, the modern human should use reason and only then becomes 'man'! The secular humanism began in the age of the Enlightenment and saw itself as a way to solve ethical questions independent of religion.
The 'modern' European Enlightenment, understood as turning away from the mediaeval Christian perception of life, began in the Renaissance, in which pagan elements of the antiquity turned from bogeyman to ideal. Renaissance and reformation started the age of Enlightenment. The European age of Enlightenment was carried by the thought that reason is able to bring out the truth. The religion of reason should bring the liberation of the dogmatic oppression and overcome faith in the authority of the Christian religion and bring freedom and prosperity for all.
From now on: human reason instead of divine revelation! Global ethos for a peaceful and human world! Democracy, the child of the Enlightenment and humanism, began its peace making work straight away: with the new 'human' method of execution of the guillotine, to which thousands of men, women and children fell victim! No sarcasm! The guillotine was really invented because of humanitarian reasons in order that the beheading was executed faster and less painful!
But the truth was that all these ideals of the Enlightment were carefully invented by certain groups with a definite goal in mind. All the leading philosophers of the Enlightenment were Freemasons, or members of the Illuminati, founded by Adam Weishaupt, and assisted in propagating its goals. To ensnare the masses, the Illuminati exploited the Gnostic ideal of "liberty". In order to present the struggle for "liberty" in context, the Illuminati constructed the myth of progress, as history evolving from superstition to "freedom" from despotism, in this case, meaning the Catholic Church. This myth of progress was actually an adaptation of Lurianic Kabbalah, and disguised the ultimate Illuminati goal of supplanting the world's religions, and incepting an occult New World Order, to be governed by their Messiah.
The Duke of Orleans was merely Lieutenant to Frederick the Great, the Grand Master of all Freemasonry. But about eight years before the Revolution, he was elected Grand Master of France, and the whole association of various lodges came to be known as the Grand Orient. The chief instigators of the Revolution, Mirabeau, Condorcet, Rochefoucault and others, were high-ranking officers of these lodges. The Count Mirabeau was himself a member of the Illuminati, and had attended the Grand Masonic Convention in 1782, at Wilhelmsbad, in Hessen-Kassel, where the ground-plan for the coming revolution have originally been discussed. In 1788, deputies of the Illuminati were sent, upon his request, to inform the French lodges on strategy. Their first item of advice was the creation of a Political Committee in every lodge, and from these committees arose the Jacobins Club. Soon, nearly every lodge in the Grand Orient was infiltrated by supporters of Weishaupt, who became active in spreading the political policies of terrorism against the state.
The "Eye of Lucifer" on the declaration of human rights and on the one dollar bill.
Interestingly, in Islam the Dajjal is called "the One-Eyed".
If the last stone is put on the pyramid,
mankind reaches Apotheosis and becomes God.
It was not difficult to deceive the masses and to win them for the "struggle for freedom", because they were oppressed by a cruel feudal system and a repressive church, under whose blessing inquisition, colonialization and all kinds of other tyranny took place, vice-regent of a tyrannical God on earth. Liberation from this oppression was welcomed everywhere, although the masses did not cogitate that behind this "liberation" was the luciferian ideal of man, who frees himself from the dictatorial God and becomes God himself.
Something is worth mentioning:
Vigorous and lasting opposition, which partly took the form of open rebellion and religious civil war, was caused by a law of the national assembly in context with the civil constitution of the clerics which on the 27th of November 1790 made it compulsory for all priests to swear an oath on the new constitution. Pope Pius VI., who already declared the declaration of human rights to be godless, forbade the oath under the punishment of excommunication.
Just imagine: Not even 200 years ago the Catholic Church declared the declaration of human rights to be godless and the oath on the new constitution was punished with excommunication! One should thoroughly digest this first! Which Catholic would nowadays even dare to say that 'reason, freedom, democracy and human rights' are godless? The pagan school of thought took over the power in the heart of Europe!
It was the cross of Christianity not to obey the commandments of God and to falsify its scriptures. The result was an oppressive church under whose blessings the inquisition, bloody colonization and many other kinds of tyranny took place. Understandably this was the best nurture for a counter movement which wanted to liberate itself!
How Islam does judge humanism and democracy? Exactly like Pope Pius VI.!
By introducing the people as 'Sovereign', like it is the case in democracy or any other form of constitution which is not based on the laws revealed by God, Allah s.w.t. is replaced as 'Sovereign' (Al-Malik). Therefore anybody who acknowledges such a form of constitution puts something else as supreme authority rather than Al-Hakam (the law-giver, one of the 99 names of Allah). This is Shirk, idol worship, and one of the sins Allah s.w.t. will not forgive!
Abdullah Ibn Mas`ud r.a. reported: "I asked the Messenger of Allah s.a.w.: 'Which sin is gravest with Allah?' He said: 'That you make something equal to Allah, while he is your Creator.'" [Bukhârî, Muslim, Tirmîdhî, Nasaî, Abû Dâwûd und Ahmad Ibn Hanbal]
It is reported that the French government in the year 1930, because of the celebration of 50 years of occupation of Tunisia, offered Tunisian officers the French citizenship. When the first Tunisian officers died, the Islamic death prayer was denied them. Why? Because by accepting the French citizenship they also acknowledged the French laws, e.g. that the inheritance was divided according to French laws and not any longer to Islamic laws. By doing this they left Islam according to the majority of Tunisian scholars!
This might serve as a serious warning also for Muslims who, without any necessity, acknowledge the democratic constitution of any country they like to get the citizenship or where they are residing. To obey the laws is one thing, to acknowledge them is another.
One either acknowledges Allah, His Prophet and the Shariah, or the constitution!
Now we probably know what the Prophet s.a.w. meant when he said:
Abu Hurayrah said, "The Prophet said, 'Shall I tell you something about the Dajjal which no Prophet has ever told his people before me? The Dajjal is one-eyed and will bring with him something which will resemble Paradise and Hell; but that which he calls Paradise will in fact be Hell. I warn you against him as Noah warned his people against him.'" [Bukhari, Muslim]
Freedom, Fraternity, Human Rights and Democracy look like Heaven but is in fact Hell, although we must admit that we have a certain sympathy for "the struggle for freedom" when we see what the church and the feudal system did to the people. God's representative on earth should surely look different.
We also must note that for most freemasons the lodges certainly are what they represent from the outside: brotherhoods who strive for humanistic ideals (like e.g. Wolfgang von Goethe, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, Sir Conan Doyle, Gustav Stresemann and many others). They might have been surprised that the liberation and self-realization of humanity ended in Christopher Street Day and similar happenings.
Masonry. conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve to be misled; to conceal the Truth.. [Freemasonic master magus of the 33rd Degree, General Albert Pike]
[The Masons] are the invisible powers behind the thrones of earth, and men are but marionettes, dancing while the invisible ones pull the strings. . We see the dancer, but the master mind that does the work remains concealed by the cloak of silence. [Manley P. Hall]
IV. Kabbalah and Zionism
Yehuda Solomon Alkalai was born in the year 1798 in Sarajevo, Bosnia. He studied in Jerusalem under different Rabbis and came under the influence of the Kabbalah. In the year 1825 he became Rabbi of Semlin, the capital of Serbia.