Climate Change

The Next Bogeyman for the Enslavement of Mankind

The flood disaster in Germany is literally water on the mills of the climate apologists. The current "consensus" holds that global warming is attributable to man-made greenhouse gases and that immediate action is required, since otherwise the end of the world would inevitably be upon us. The correlation between CO2 and all the attributed weather phenomena has yet to be proven; nevertheless, politics and the media continually recite that any debate based on this is over. Whether raging hurricanes, wildfires, or monsoon-like rainfall, all the caprices are said to be acute side effects of "climate change." But the certified meteorologist Andreas Friedrich of the German Weather Service stated shortly after the flood disaster: "The claim that climate change is to blame is not tenable in this way."

On the same day that Greta Thunberg delivered a passionate speech before the United Nations about her fears of a climate emergency, a group of 500 prominent scientists and professionals led by CLINTEL co-founder Guus Berkhout sent this registered letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, stating that there is no climate emergency and that climate policy should be designed to benefit people's lives. But unlike Greta's emotional appearance, the statement by renowned scientists received no hearing and no media coverage.

Could it be that once again a natural phenomenon is being blown out of proportion and instrumentalized (and perhaps also given a little helping hand), in order to once again invoke citizens' fear of impending doom, in order to once again impose logically inevitable measures upon them and to justify further drastic curtailing of fundamental rights?

The human psyche is quite simply constructed. One frightens the citizens with terrorists, killer viruses, and climate change, and offers them the only solution that seems to make sense: a few concessions in personal freedom for security and the general welfare. For one knows very well how "reasonable people" react to certain information. To determine the desired reaction, one need only control the type of data presented to them, or the type of circumstances in which they find themselves — and as rational people, they will do what one wants them to do.

If there really are people striving for a worldwide dictatorship (and there is no doubt that there are), then a man-made climate change would be the perfect alibi for a global eco-dictatorship. Not only would individual states be forced to surrender national sovereignty in favour of transnational entities like the UN, every individual emission of CO2 could be recorded and controlled — quite simply our entire lives! Every single breath could enter into a meticulously kept CO2 balance sheet!

Dystopias of this kind are depicted in many films and books. In the film 'In Time,' for example, everyone has a kind of chip in their arm that shows them their remaining lifetime and kills them once it has expired. Time is also the currency of this world, and everything must be bought with precious minutes and hours, while time in turn must be earned through work. Since, due to genetic modification, no one ages further after the age of 25, lifetime depends exclusively on the amount of the currency 'time.' The rich thereby have an extremely long and healthy life, while the poor die young.

Instead of taking the factor of time, the factor of CO2 emission is taken. Thereby each person is allotted a certain amount of CO2 output, and every smallest activity is controlled and registered, including every breath. Once the upper limit is reached, one is recycled and composted. (Of course, there will also be "emissions trading" there — it already exists today — and the rich will also have a long life there.)

Sounds surreal and unrealistic? The tracks for it have already been laid:

- Washington became the first US state to legalize human composting, after its environmentally friendly governor signed a law to reduce carbon emissions from burial. The new law took effect in May 2020. Those who die in that state now have the option of using the deceased's body as fertilizer for use in gardening. This process is called recycling.

- Microsoft patent number WO2020060606 provides for reading people's body activity data via a biosensor, and based on this data, assigning or denying cryptocurrencies to people.

- The German Environment Agency already tells us that we should all soon eat insects and lab-grown meat in order to save the climate.

- Also, right on time for the start of the plandemic in April 2020, commercial assisted suicide was legalized in Germany. More and more states are thus following the Dutch model of euthanasia. There, since 2020, even healthy 75-year-olds and depressives may have doctors kill them with poison injections. It takes only a few catastrophic events for a right to become a duty in the name of CO2 and resource saving.

Here Grandpa is being recycled.

What could such a catastrophic event look like? The Prophet (s.a.w.) has already told us:

There will be three hard years before the Dajjal appears. During these years, people will be afflicted by a great famine. In the first year, Allah will command the sky to withhold a third of its rain, and the earth to withhold a third of its yield. In the second year, Allah will command the sky to withhold two-thirds of its rain, and the earth to withhold two-thirds of its yield. In the third year, Allah will command the sky to withhold all its rain, and not a single drop will fall. He will command the earth to withhold all its produce, and no plant will grow. All hoofed animals will perish, except what Allah wills. (Ibn Majah)

Imagine this scenario: three years of drought and millions of starvation deaths worldwide! And Dajjal can make people believe this is due to greenhouse gases! People will cry out for the eco-dictatorship! And precisely that will be the moment when the world government is formed and the person Dajjal becomes the leader. "For my part, let the state allot me my CO2 emission / lifetime, as long as I am allowed to live at all," people will think, just as they think nowadays: "Better a gene therapy with emergency approval and unforeseeable late effects than being exterminated by the killer virus."

This will also be the moment when no repentance will be accepted any longer:

When three signs appear, no soul will benefit from its faith if it has not believed before or earned good through its faith: the rising of the sun from the west, the False Messiah, and the beast from the earth. (Muslim)

Note that these years of drought are not caused by Dajjal himself, although Dajjal is indeed attributed the ability to manipulate the weather:

The Dajjal will cause rain to fall from the sky. (Muslim, Tirmidhi)

The Prophet (s.a.w.) thus clearly makes us understand that this is precisely not a man-made climate change! And in the second part of the hadith, he tells us what we are to do:

He (sallallahu `alaihi wa sallam) was asked: "What will sustain people during this time?" He said: "Tahlil, takbir and tahmid (the speaking of la ilaha ill Allah, Allahu akbar and al-hamdulillah). This will sustain them just as food does." (Ibn Majah)

This is therefore the ultimate test for mankind, for nothing but God will be able to save one. No preparations, no survival training, no permaculture — nothing but the power of Allah Himself. Which of course does not mean one should make no preparations at all. In any case, one should leave the cities and go as far into the wilderness as possible.

That Dajjal influences the weather in order to steer the discussion about climate change in the intended direction may well be assumed. Already 70 years ago there were 35 fatalities in the notorious Lynmouth flood disaster, only a few days after weather experiments by the Royal Air Force over southern England. This was reported by, among others, the BBC (Rain-making link to killer floods) and The Guardian (RAF rainmakers caused 1952 flood). How many deaths and environmental devastations are attributable to such experiments since 1952 can no longer be determined. But the Lynmouth flood disaster was not the only man-made weather tragedy. Weather weapons like HAARP are a fixed component of the major powers' arsenals, even if they are internationally outlawed. From earthquakes to tsunamis to droughts and tornadoes, they can do it all today.

Many indications point to the fact that the fires in California and Australia did not have an exclusively natural cause. Firefighters reported that plastics attached to metal melted completely, while standalone plastics withstood what was presumably extraordinary heat. Other investigators observed how guardrails caught fire at the points where the metal bolts were connected to the wood. Fires were observed that were at least three times as hot as an average house fire; hot enough to melt aluminium and glass and turn houses into pure ash, while the plastic garbage cans beside them or nearby trees remained untouched. Residents also reported that the houses had essentially begun to burn simultaneously.

Houses burned, but trees beside them did not.

DEWs (Directed Energy Weapons) could produce these effects. Most of us are familiar with how microwave ovens heat and interact with food, and how this differs from the effects of heat or convection ovens. We know that plastics are "microwave-safe," while metals explode violently when exposed to microwaves. The houses with their metal parts thus caught fire, while standalone garbage cans and trees were spared.

Certainly an easy thing for Dajjal to set a little fire here, in order to dramatize "the consequences of climate change," just as it would be an easy thing for him to raise the amount of precipitation in the Eifel considerably.

Back to the question of the extent to which climate change actually takes place, and what its cause is. For this, we would like to give the floor to an expert who admits to being ashamed of earlier statements about climate change.

-----------

Meteorologist Klaus-Eckart Puls is one of thousands of scientists worldwide who meanwhile assess the situation differently from the generally propagated "consensus." In an interview with Bettina Hahne-Waldscheck of the Swiss magazine "factum," he spoke in a manner unusually open for the subject:

factum: You have been criticizing the theory of man-made climate change for years. In the meantime, many prominent scientists are speaking out in this sense. How did you become a climate skeptic?

Puls: Until ten years ago, I too uncheckedly parroted what the IPCC tells us. At some point I began to verify the claims. The result: it began with doubts and then culminated in horror and in the realization that a great deal of what the IPCC and the media say about climate change is not true and is not at all covered by scientific facts and measurements. For what I, as a natural scientist, once uncheckedly "re-told" even in my own lectures, I am ashamed today.

The CO2 climate hysteria, which is obviously particularly pronounced in Germany, is, in my view, ideologically and materially networked and enforced by a community of interest of profiteers.

factum: What then is the situation with global warming? Does climate change exist?

Puls: Yes, for climate change is the normal thing; consequently there have always been "global warming" phases that even far exceeded today's extent. In the last hundred years there has been a "global warming" of three-quarters of a degree. Since 1998, however, there has been no more global warming, while CO2 continues to rise. The institutes close to the IPCC have observed a slight cooling of one to two tenths of a degree since 1998; at most one can speak of a so-called temperature plateau. Generally: the climate has always changed and will always change.

factum: The IPCC predicts 0.2 degrees of warming per decade, or two to four degrees of warming by 2100. How do you assess that?

Puls: These are speculative model prophecies, so-called scenarios — not forecasts. Climate is a highly complex non-linear system; therefore forecasts are impossible. That is also stated verbatim in the IPCC report of 2001. Nature does what it wants, and not what the models prophesy. The whole CO2 debate is nonsensical. Even if atmospheric CO2 is doubled, for physical reasons that can only cause about one degree of warming. The remaining warming assumed by the IPCC is based on speculative amplification processes that are proven by nothing. Right now we can observe that the earth has not warmed for 13 years, although CO2 has continued to increase.

factum: What about rising sea levels?

Puls: The rise has slowed more and more, and in the last two years the global sea level has even fallen by more than half a centimetre. These results have come about in the last 20 years through measurements by satellites; tide gauge measurements have existed worldwide for about 150 years. The so-called "mean sea level" is a calculated value, not a measured value. Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as a "global sea level" at all. We have height differences of up to 150 metres in the world's oceans. Sea level is also influenced by tectonic processes, such as continental uplift and subsidence, as well as by changes in wind currents, trade winds, and volcanism. Climate change is only one of ten factors there. Quite accurate statements can be made, for example, about the North Sea, where regular tide gauge measurements are taken.

factum: What is measured for the North Sea?

Puls: In the last 400 years, the sea level on the North Sea coast has risen by about 1.40 metres. That is 35 centimetres per century. In the last hundred years, the North Sea has risen by only 25 centimetres. The rise has therefore slowed.

factum: Does the rise have something to do with the melting ice at the North Pole?

Puls: That is a fallacy. Even if all the floating North Pole ice melted, the sea level would not rise by a single millimetre. Take a glass of water with ice cubes and wait until they have melted. The level in the glass is not higher afterwards. This is because water increases its volume by ten percent when it freezes, and decreases by that amount again when it melts. Only these ten percent of the iceberg protrude from the water, and disappear again upon melting. That is Archimedes' principle.

Disingenuous correlation between sea rise and Arctic ice
here in the daily brainwashing at Spiegel-Online.

factum: And the fact that the glaciers in the Alps are melting is also not only due to global warming?

Puls: There are many factors there too. When one climbs a mountain, the temperature falls by 0.65 degrees per 100 metres. When it became three-quarters of a degree warmer in the last hundred years, the mean zero-degree line thus shifted upward by about 100 metres. What is observable, however, is that not only the lower glaciers are melting, but also those at 1000 metres and higher. That has a different cause, namely soot and dust. Darker ice full of aerosols absorbs more solar radiation, whereby the radiation is converted into sensible heat. You notice the difference yourself when you wear a black T-shirt instead of a white one, under which you become much warmer in the sun. But soot and dust have not only existed anthropogenically since industrialization, but also in nature, for example through volcanism, dust storms, forest and steppe fires. For these reasons, glacier melting has always occurred in Earth's history as well, whereby one knows, for example, from research results of glaciologists that the Alpine glaciers were mostly smaller in the last 10,000 years than today.

factum: In your view, the situation with the melting ice in Antarctica, where a huge iceberg broke off three years ago, is not so bad after all?

Puls: No, on the contrary. In the last 30 years, the Antarctic ice cap has increased in area and volume, and the temperature there has decreased. This applies both to Antarctica and to the peripheral floating ice belt. This 30-year trend can be assessed quite well because, roughly since that time, there has been a measurement network there with about 40 stations from various countries. Stations that have been measuring for longer, such as the US Amundsen-Scott Station directly at the South Pole, document that the temperature has even been declining since 1957. In Antarctica, 90 percent of the Earth's ice is bound, and Antarctica is about one and a half times the size of Europe.

Extent of sea ice June 2021

factum: Why do we then often read that it has become warmer in Antarctica?

Puls: The only Antarctic region worth mentioning in which it has become warmer in recent decades is precisely the area in which a 100-square-kilometre iceberg broke off from the Wilkins Shelf in March 2008: the region of the Antarctic Peninsula. However, it comprises barely one percent of the area of Antarctica. This peninsula lies about 1000 kilometres south of Tierra del Fuego and extends a further 1000 kilometres to the south. It thus lies fully within the sphere of influence of the strongest storm zone on Earth, the southern hemisphere westerly drift.

factum: What causes such break-offs?

Puls: In ice break-offs in West Antarctica, not only thickness, pressure, and consequently sliding play a role, but over the centuries also intensity fluctuations of these westerly winds, analogous to the circulation fluctuations in the temperate latitudes of the northern hemisphere, for example over the North Atlantic. If the westerly winds intensify, which has been observed in the southern hemisphere for more than 20 years, then it becomes warmer, for example, on the west coast of the Antarctic Peninsula, for the temperature difference between the winds and the seawater and ice surging against them is more than 20 degrees. A second factor is the storm waves caused by the winds. They beat against the ice and mechanically cause an ice break-off. And a third factor: when more and more snow and ice pile up upward, the ice thickness grows and with it the downward pressure. Pressure generates heat, so that a liquid water layer forms beneath the ice, on which the glaciers begin to slide. All these causes are thus meteorological or physical in nature and have nothing to do with any climate catastrophe.

Greta Thunberg with one-eye Dajjal symbolism
is sponsored by precisely the people
who also sponsor the Corona show:
Rockefeller, Bill Gates etc.

factum: Then there must have been such ice break-offs earlier as well?

Puls: Yes, for thousands of years, including in the 70s, when "global warming" was not yet being spoken of. On the contrary: In August 1974, "SPIEGEL" still headlined "Is a new ice age coming?" At that time there were ice break-offs of several hundred square kilometres in diameter, so that the media discussed whether to bring the icebergs by tug to dry countries like South Africa or Namibia as drinking water supply. But that was then logistically difficult to manage.

factum: What about the photos of the polar bears that no longer have enough ice and that are gladly printed in the media when it comes to climate change?

Puls: That is one of the worst climate hysteria stories. The polar bear is the icon there. The polar bear does not eat ice; it eats seals. It dies when we hunt or even exterminate the seals, not when the ice melts. It has enough land on which it can live; there are very many islands in the North Pole region, plus northern Greenland, Alaska, Siberia, the entire polar cap. The polar bear population has even increased during the moderate climate warming in the northern hemisphere! 50 years ago, 5000 polar bears were counted in the entire North Pole region; today there are about 25,000 polar bears.

factum: But it is true that the ice in the Arctic, unlike in Antarctica, continues to melt?

Puls: Yes, it has been melting for 30 years. But that has also happened twice in the last 150 years. In 2007 there was a summer low point, but since then there has been somewhat more ice again every summer. The ice melts in summer and gains again in winter. The researchers' concern in 2007 that the so-called irreversible tipping point had been reached was unfounded. The summer low point of 2007 has not been reached or even undercut for five years. Ice melting has always occurred. Between 900 and 1300, Greenland was already green in its marginal areas; the Vikings settled "Green-Land."

factum: And what do you say about the often-claimed expansion of deserts?

Puls: That does not exist. The Sahara, for example, shrank in favour of the surrounding steppes. In the last 20 years, the Sahara shrank in the north by about 300,000 square kilometres, an area almost as large as Germany. In the south of the Sahara lie the dry steppes of the Sahel belt. There too, for more than 20 years, both an increase in precipitation and the spread of certain trees and shrubs have been observed. Meanwhile, an area of about 300,000 square kilometres has "greened." The famine that occurred in 2010 in Somalia, Kenya, and Ethiopia arose primarily through the leasing of large tracts of land by international corporations and the cultivation there of biofuel plants for Europe, as well as, of course, through war and terror. However, in prosperous Europe it seems more convenient to make a fictitious climate catastrophe responsible for the social errors and failings of this world.

From 1982 to 2010, the green area of the Earth
despite deforestation of the rainforests
increased by twice the area of the USA.

factum: Do we then need to do nothing at all about climate change?

Puls: We can do nothing about it. Scientifically, it is simply absurd to want to hold on to "a nicely pleasant stable climate" by a few turns of some CO2 adjustment screws. Many, however, confuse climate protection and environmental protection. We cannot protect the climate, but we must of course protect the environment and concern ourselves with clean drinking water for all peoples. Something else is important to me: a debate about alternative energies that is in many approaches sensible is, in my view, saddled onto an irrational climate debate. The one has nothing to do with the other.

-----------

It should also be mentioned here that our Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) predicted that one of the signs of the Last Day will be that the land of Arabia will again be green and provided with rivers, as it once was (reported by Muslim). This may be a surprising statement when one considers that the Arabs could not believe or know that Arabia was once lush and fertile and had rivers.

The discovery of a unique species of elephant tusks in the Arabian desert shows that the desert land of Arabia was indeed once lushly green and possessed large bodies of water. It is vivid proof, say archaeologists, that large animals once roamed lush and fertile plains where today the wind-blown sand covers the scorching Nafud desert. There were even hippopotamuses there.

"With the help of satellite technology for mapping the terrain, we predict that there are tens of thousands of unknown archaeological sites in the Arabian desert," says project leader Prof. Mike Petraglia. "There are over 7,000 [dried-up] lake beds on the peninsula, most of them in Saudi Arabia."

The re-greening will happen after Jesus (a.s.) has killed the Dajjal, but it has already begun now. The Dajjal's days are already numbered. So one should not lose hope!

___________________________

Next chapter of the series:

___________________________

Related articles: